Agent Infrastructure · Head-to-head
Composio vs Graphiti
Composio and Graphiti are both agent infrastructure. Composio is SDKs that give AI agents 1,000+ pre-authenticated toolkits, per-user sessions, triggers and a sandbox, while Graphiti is a framework for building temporal context graphs that give AI agents memory of how facts change. Here's an independent, side-by-side look at how they compare — and which fits.
SDKs that give AI agents 1,000+ pre-authenticated toolkits, per-user sessions, triggers and a sandbox.
Visit Composio →
A framework for building temporal context graphs that give AI agents memory of how facts change.
Visit Graphiti →Composio and Graphiti are both open-source agent infrastructure you can self-host for free. Composio is written primarily in TypeScript; Graphiti in Python. Neither is universally better — pick by fit.
Side by side
| Spec | Composio | Graphiti |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Model | Open source | Open source |
| Pricing | Open source | Open source |
| GitHub stars | 30,294 | 31,089 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last activity | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Key differences
- Composio is written primarily in TypeScript; Graphiti in Python.
- Licensing differs: Composio is MIT, Graphiti is Apache-2.0.
Agents that must act in many SaaS apps on behalf of individual users without building each OAuth flow.
Agents whose memory must reflect changing facts, such as customer or project state over time.
About Composio
Composio's open-source SDK monorepo covers TypeScript and Python SDKs, a CLI and adapters for the OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude Agent SDK, Vercel AI SDK, LangChain and others. Through Composio's platform it gives agents more than 1,000 toolkits with managed authentication, per-user sessions, triggers and a sandboxed workbench, so agents can act across third-party apps.
Full Composio profile →About Graphiti
Graphiti, from Zep, builds and queries temporal context graphs for AI agents. Unlike static knowledge graphs it tracks how facts change over time, keeps provenance to source data and supports prescribed and learned ontologies, integrating user interactions and structured and unstructured data incrementally. It works with graph databases including Neo4j, FalkorDB, Kuzu and Amazon Neptune; Zep offers a managed service built on it.
Full Graphiti profile →Frequently asked
- What's the main difference between Composio and Graphiti?
- Composio is written primarily in TypeScript; Graphiti in Python.
- Is Composio or Graphiti better?
- Neither is universally better. Composio is the stronger fit for Agents that must act in many SaaS apps on behalf of individual users without building each OAuth flow; Graphiti for Agents whose memory must reflect changing facts, such as customer or project state over time. Use the side-by-side specs to decide by your own constraints.
- Is Composio or Graphiti free?
- Composio is free to run and self-host; Graphiti is free to run and self-host. Both are free to self-host — you only pay for the infrastructure and any model or API usage.
- Which is more popular, Composio or Graphiti?
- By GitHub stars — a proxy for open-source adoption — Graphiti is ahead (31k vs 30k). Stars measure attention, not necessarily the better fit for you.
More agent infrastructure comparisons
- Browserbase vs Graphiti
- Browserbase vs Composio
- Graphiti vs Pipecat Cloud
- Composio vs Pipecat Cloud
- daytona vs Graphiti
- Composio vs daytona