Voice Agents · Head-to-head
LiveKit Agents vs Pipecat
LiveKit Agents and Pipecat are both voice agents. LiveKit Agents is Build voice and multimodal agents that participate in LiveKit rooms, while Pipecat is compose voice and multimodal agents with Python processing pipelines. Here's an independent, side-by-side look at how they compare — and which fits.
Build voice and multimodal agents that participate in LiveKit rooms.
Visit LiveKit Agents →LiveKit Agents and Pipecat are both open-source voice agents you can self-host for free. Licensing differs: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0, Pipecat is BSD-2-Clause. Neither is universally better — pick by fit.
Side by side
| Spec | LiveKit Agents | Pipecat |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Framework | Framework |
| Model | Open source | Open source |
| Pricing | Open source | Open source |
| GitHub stars | 14,178 | 15,510 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Last activity | Sep 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Key differences
- Licensing differs: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0, Pipecat is BSD-2-Clause.
Developers building custom voice or multimodal agents around LiveKit rooms and their own application logic.
Python developers who want to choose the services and processing stages in a custom voice or multimodal application.
About LiveKit Agents
LiveKit Agents is an open-source framework for connecting agent code to real-time voice, video and text sessions. The Python repository provides model integrations, turn handling and agent dispatch. A separate Node.js SDK is also available. Agents can run in LiveKit Cloud or a custom environment; model, transport and hosting costs depend on the deployment.
Full LiveKit Agents profile →About Pipecat
Pipecat is an open-source Python framework that connects transport, speech recognition, language models and speech synthesis through processing pipelines. It supports voice and multimodal applications, with self-hosted and managed deployment options. The framework license does not make model APIs, telephony or hosting free.
Full Pipecat profile →Frequently asked
- What's the main difference between LiveKit Agents and Pipecat?
- Licensing differs: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0, Pipecat is BSD-2-Clause.
- Is LiveKit Agents or Pipecat better?
- Neither is universally better. LiveKit Agents is the stronger fit for Developers building custom voice or multimodal agents around LiveKit rooms and their own application logic; Pipecat for Python developers who want to choose the services and processing stages in a custom voice or multimodal application. Use the side-by-side specs to decide by your own constraints.
- Is LiveKit Agents or Pipecat free?
- LiveKit Agents is free to run and self-host; Pipecat is free to run and self-host. Both are free to self-host — you only pay for the infrastructure and any model or API usage.
- Which is more popular, LiveKit Agents or Pipecat?
- By GitHub stars — a proxy for open-source adoption — Pipecat is ahead (16k vs 14k). Stars measure attention, not necessarily the better fit for you.
More voice agents comparisons
- Pipecat vs Vapi
- LiveKit Agents vs Vapi
- Pipecat vs Retell AI
- LiveKit Agents vs Retell AI
- ElevenLabs Agents vs Pipecat
- ElevenLabs Agents vs LiveKit Agents