Skip to content
Agent Search Engine.

Voice Agents · Head-to-head

LiveKit Agents vs Pipecat

LiveKit Agents and Pipecat are both voice agents. LiveKit Agents is Build voice and multimodal agents that participate in LiveKit rooms, while Pipecat is compose voice and multimodal agents with Python processing pipelines. Here's an independent, side-by-side look at how they compare — and which fits.

LiveKit Agents

Framework· Open source

Build voice and multimodal agents that participate in LiveKit rooms.

Visit LiveKit Agents
Pipecat

Framework· Open source

Compose voice and multimodal agents with Python processing pipelines.

Visit Pipecat

Bottom line

LiveKit Agents and Pipecat are both open-source voice agents you can self-host for free. Licensing differs: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0, Pipecat is BSD-2-Clause. Neither is universally better — pick by fit.

Building one yourself? Choose and evaluate a voice agent stack

Side by side

SpecLiveKit AgentsPipecat
TypeFrameworkFramework
ModelOpen sourceOpen source
PricingOpen sourceOpen source
GitHub stars14,17815,510
LanguagePythonPython
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-2-Clause
Last activitySep 2026Sep 2026

Key differences

  • Licensing differs: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0, Pipecat is BSD-2-Clause.

Choose LiveKit Agents if

Developers building custom voice or multimodal agents around LiveKit rooms and their own application logic.

Choose Pipecat if

Python developers who want to choose the services and processing stages in a custom voice or multimodal application.

About LiveKit Agents

LiveKit Agents is an open-source framework for connecting agent code to real-time voice, video and text sessions. The Python repository provides model integrations, turn handling and agent dispatch. A separate Node.js SDK is also available. Agents can run in LiveKit Cloud or a custom environment; model, transport and hosting costs depend on the deployment.

Full LiveKit Agents profile →

About Pipecat

Pipecat is an open-source Python framework that connects transport, speech recognition, language models and speech synthesis through processing pipelines. It supports voice and multimodal applications, with self-hosted and managed deployment options. The framework license does not make model APIs, telephony or hosting free.

Full Pipecat profile →

Frequently asked

What's the main difference between LiveKit Agents and Pipecat?
Licensing differs: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0, Pipecat is BSD-2-Clause.
Is LiveKit Agents or Pipecat better?
Neither is universally better. LiveKit Agents is the stronger fit for Developers building custom voice or multimodal agents around LiveKit rooms and their own application logic; Pipecat for Python developers who want to choose the services and processing stages in a custom voice or multimodal application. Use the side-by-side specs to decide by your own constraints.
Is LiveKit Agents or Pipecat free?
LiveKit Agents is free to run and self-host; Pipecat is free to run and self-host. Both are free to self-host — you only pay for the infrastructure and any model or API usage.
Which is more popular, LiveKit Agents or Pipecat?
By GitHub stars — a proxy for open-source adoption — Pipecat is ahead (16k vs 14k). Stars measure attention, not necessarily the better fit for you.
For agent buildersMake your product part of the discovery.Explore advertising

More voice agents comparisons

All voice agents