Is midscene or nanobrowser free?

midscene is free to run and self-host; nanobrowser is free to run and self-host. Both are free to self-host — you only pay for the infrastructure and any model or API usage.

Which is more popular, midscene or nanobrowser?

By GitHub stars — a proxy for open-source adoption — midscene is ahead (14k vs 13k). Stars measure attention, not necessarily the better fit for you.

Browser & Computer Use · Head-to-head

midscene vs nanobrowser

midscene and nanobrowser are both browser & computer use. midscene is AI-powered, vision-driven UI automation for every platform, while nanobrowser is open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. Run multi-agent workflows using your own LLM API key. Alternative to OpenAI Ope…. Here's an independent, side-by-side look at how they compare — and which fits.

midscene

Agent· Open source

AI-powered, vision-driven UI automation for every platform.

Visit midscene →

nanobrowser

Agent· Open source

Open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. Run multi-agent workflows using your own LLM API key. Alternative to OpenAI Ope…

Visit nanobrowser →

Bottom line

midscene and nanobrowser are both open-source browser & computer use you can self-host for free. Licensing differs: midscene is MIT, nanobrowser is Apache-2.0. Neither is universally better — pick by fit.

Side by side

Spec	midscene	nanobrowser
Type	Agent	Agent
Model	Open source	Open source
Pricing	Open source	Open source
GitHub stars	14,028	13,442
Language	TypeScript	TypeScript
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Last activity	Jul 2026	Nov 2025

Key differences

Licensing differs: midscene is MIT, nanobrowser is Apache-2.0.

Choose midscene if

AI-powered, vision-driven UI automation for every platform.

Choose nanobrowser if

Open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. Run multi-agent workflows using your own LLM API key. Alternative to OpenAI Ope….

About midscene

AI-powered, vision-driven UI automation for every platform.

Full midscene profile →

About nanobrowser

Open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. Run multi-agent workflows using your own LLM API key. Alternative to OpenAI Operator.

Full nanobrowser profile →

Frequently asked

What's the main difference between midscene and nanobrowser?: Licensing differs: midscene is MIT, nanobrowser is Apache-2.0.
Is midscene or nanobrowser better?: Neither is universally better. midscene is the stronger fit for aI-powered, vision-driven UI automation for every platform; nanobrowser for open-Source Chrome extension for AI-powered web automation. Run multi-agent workflows using your own LLM API key. Alternative to OpenAI Ope…. Use the side-by-side specs to decide by your own constraints.
Is midscene or nanobrowser free?: midscene is free to run and self-host; nanobrowser is free to run and self-host. Both are free to self-host — you only pay for the infrastructure and any model or API usage.
Which is more popular, midscene or nanobrowser?: By GitHub stars — a proxy for open-source adoption — midscene is ahead (14k vs 13k). Stars measure attention, not necessarily the better fit for you.

Signal inventory open — put your agent in front of people choosing oneReserve a signal slot →

More browser & computer use comparisons

All browser & computer use →