What's the main difference between Cursor and OpenCode?

Cursor is a commercial product; OpenCode is open-source and self-hostable.

Is Cursor or OpenCode better?

Neither is universally better. Cursor is the stronger fit for Teams that want an AI-native IDE with agent mode, multi-file edits, and background tasks in a familiar VS Code feel; OpenCode for Developers who want to choose a model provider for an interactive repository coding workflow. Use the side-by-side specs to decide by your own constraints.

Is Cursor or OpenCode free?

Cursor is free to start (freemium), with paid tiers; OpenCode is free to run and self-host.

Which is more popular, Cursor or OpenCode?

We rank open-source projects by GitHub adoption, but at least one of these is a commercial product and stars don't measure commercial adoption — so compare them on capabilities and pricing instead.

Coding Agents · Head-to-head

Cursor vs OpenCode

Cursor and OpenCode are both coding agents. Cursor is AI-first code editor with agent mode for multi-file edits and background tasks, while OpenCode is open-source coding agent with a terminal interface and model-provider choice. Here's an independent, side-by-side look at how they compare — and which fits.

Cursor

Agent· Freemium

AI-first code editor with agent mode for multi-file edits and background tasks.

Visit Cursor →

OpenCode

Agent· Open source

Open-source coding agent with a terminal interface and model-provider choice.

Visit OpenCode →

Bottom line

Cursor and OpenCode take different routes to the same job: one is a commercial product, the other open-source and self-hostable. Choose based on whether you want a managed experience or full control.

Building one yourself? How to build a coding agent →

Side by side

Spec	Cursor	OpenCode
Type	Agent	Agent
Model	Commercial	Open source
Pricing	Freemium	Open source
GitHub stars	—	207,572
License	—	MIT
Last activity	—	Sep 2026

Key differences

Cursor is a commercial product; OpenCode is open-source and self-hostable.
Pricing model differs — Cursor is freemium, OpenCode is open source.

Choose Cursor if

Teams that want an AI-native IDE with agent mode, multi-file edits, and background tasks in a familiar VS Code feel.

Choose OpenCode if

Developers who want to choose a model provider for an interactive repository coding workflow.

About Cursor

AI-first code editor with agent mode for multi-file edits and background tasks.

Full Cursor profile →

About OpenCode

OpenCode is a coding agent for working with a repository from the terminal, with additional desktop and editor interfaces. It supports multiple model providers. The open-source license covers the tool; hosted models and other connected services may charge separately.

Full OpenCode profile →

Frequently asked

What's the main difference between Cursor and OpenCode?: Cursor is a commercial product; OpenCode is open-source and self-hostable.
Is Cursor or OpenCode better?: Neither is universally better. Cursor is the stronger fit for Teams that want an AI-native IDE with agent mode, multi-file edits, and background tasks in a familiar VS Code feel; OpenCode for Developers who want to choose a model provider for an interactive repository coding workflow. Use the side-by-side specs to decide by your own constraints.
Is Cursor or OpenCode free?: Cursor is free to start (freemium), with paid tiers; OpenCode is free to run and self-host.
Which is more popular, Cursor or OpenCode?: We rank open-source projects by GitHub adoption, but at least one of these is a commercial product and stars don't measure commercial adoption — so compare them on capabilities and pricing instead.

For agent buildersMake your product part of the discovery.Explore advertising

More coding agents comparisons

All coding agents →